Washington, D.C. A New Hotbed of Nord Stream 2 Activity

Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Washington, D.C. A New Hotbed of Nord Stream 2 Activity

Thu, 08/06/2020 - 09:12
1 comment
Washington DC Capitol (copyright by Adobe Stock/Stocked House Studio)
Washington DC Capitol (copyright by Adobe Stock/Stocked House Studio)

The fate of the troubled $11 billion Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project could very well be decided over the next several weeks in Washington, D.C., with lobbyists on both sides of the case ramping up their activities.

On the one hand, Gazprom's Nord Stream 2 AG has paid lobbyists at BGR Group, Roberti Global LLC, and Sweeney & Associates a combined $1.69 million during the first half of this year, according to Senate records. That is more than double the amount during the same period a year ago, and more than all of 2018, the first full year the project lobbied in Washington.

On the other, lobbyists for Nord Stream 2’s foreign opponents have registered under the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA), a law passed in 1938 to limit the influence of Germany and Russia in U.S. politics. Under FARA, lobbyists must disclose every meeting with U.S. officials, along with the materials they distribute. Yorktown Solutions LLC, for example, which lobbies for Ukraine's state-owned Naftogaz and its partner companies against the pipeline, is among them, according to FARA records.

Andriy Kobolyev, Naftogaz's chief executive told Reuters in an email that company representatives travel to Washington about once a month to provide updates on the status of Nord Stream 2 and discuss how to stop the pipeline.

Exactly who the lobbyists for Nord Stream's completion meet with is a mystery because they have not registered with the Department of Justice under FARA. 

Austria's OMV, German firms Uniper and Wintershall, Royal Dutch Shell and France's Engie provide half of Nord Stream's long-term financing.


Submitted by Caveat Venditor (not verified) on Fri, 08/07/2020 - 15:37 Permalink

If US concern is Europe's over reliance on Russian gas, as they so often state, then why do they not threaten Ukraine's Naftogaz for transporting an equivalent volume of Russian gas into Europe that would have been transported via Nord Stream 2 if they were successful in shutting it down? The US is making a transparently absurd argument on its face..

US objections clearly ring hollow and that hollow ring is now resounding throughout Germany and beyond. "How to Lose Friends and Strong Arm Nations", a book waiting to be written. This will not end well.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Text only

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.